A Passion for Papaya is Not Propaganda

A Passion for Papaya is Not Propaganda


Dr. Marion Nestle referred to the film Food Evolution as “propaganda” and the other activists like Zen Honeycutt and the Food Babe are jumping onboard.  This implies that the content was misleading, and meant to affect opinions using less-than-honest means. I was really shocked when 45 academic signatories wrote the letter calling the film propaganda from the agrochemical industry.

I’m glad to offer you a taste of that propaganda, or should I say, papaya.

The film’s first part shows a horrible battle that happened here in my home state of Hawaii.  Non-farmers and well-financed mainland activists wanted my family to abandon a technology, the virus-resistant papaya.  The papaya was made resistant by genetic engineering, and it was done by universities and government to help the local papaya farmers. It was not the “agrochemical industry”.

Mainland activists riled up local agitators by carefully crafting a massive fear campaign in our communities and manipulated a vote against the papaya. Claims were made that it was poison, it caused tumors, it was increasing pesticide use and more diseases in the industry.  None of this was true, but in fear of retaliation, the majority of the council voted to ban it anyway.

The Food Evolution film crew was in Hawaii because it was the important national story at the time. They covered the story in great detail and presented it as it unfolded, giving plenty of time to the papaya’s opposition.

It also shows how farmers pushed back, and Margaret Wille and the County Council then grandfathered the papaya in, even though they believed (the propaganda) that it was carcinogenic and harmful.

They were caught in a hypocrisy when one tells the public improved fruits are dangerous but then exempt them with pressure.  This is fact.  This is hardly propaganda. The papaya works, it saved an industry, and is outstanding technology.

So it is very disappointing to me that Nestle, Pollan and 45 others go on record calling this story agrochemical industry propaganda, when it is a far cry from the truth.

It is especially disturbing because many of the people that refer to my family’s livelihood as propaganda are graduate students and professors. It seems like a bad career move to call the chronicling political resistance to successful technology agrochemical industry propaganda.

It is even more troubling that these are students and professors that claim to be in favor of small-holder family farms and sustainability.  The papaya allows my family to sustainably produce a local staple that would be gone if it was not for the technology.

If I was a student or faculty member I would think carefully before signing my name to a movement laden with false claims. It seems like the academic road is very difficult today, and when a search of your name shows you standing up against technology and small family farmers, it seems like a short-sighted career move. Your name on that letter symbolizes the rejection of science and the benefits it can have for small family farms globally, who face climate change and it’s consequences.  Do you really stand against that reality?

If you ever are over in the islands please let me know and I’ll personally introduce you to our “giant agrochemical industry”, which is me, my family and two dedicated farm workers, growing a delicious and valued fruit. The movie Food Evolution told our story, our fight, and our ongoing success very accurately.  I would think very carefully before calling my family’s reality throwaway propaganda.


Joni Kamiya–The Hawaii Farmer’s Daughter

Dehumanizing of Mankind

Dehumanizing of Mankind

I can’t tell you how disheartening it is to see more and more of the shill and troll accusations flying around by several of the anti-GMO supporters regarding Food Evolution.  It’s maddening to me that a professor of nutrition is even using those terms and trying to back out of the film.  So what’s wrong with this crier of shill and troll bit?



These are shills.  Does it look human to you?

18713347 - the troll

This is a troll.  Does it look human to you?


This is my family.  We indeed look human.

Can you see the difference between the trolls and shills and my family?  The two images above are clearly not human and when people start resorting to name calling, it dehumanizes people.  When you’re dehumanized to a troll or a shill, it’s easy to forget about the beating heart, the feelings, and thoughts of that person speaking out to you and challenging your beliefs.

When a person is no longer seen as human, it is easy to treat them badly.  You can kick a troll and beat it into the ground, and you can throw that shill coin away.  It’s just an object with no feelings and no life.  When those objects are gone, it’s easy to forget about them.  It’s abhorrent to do that to a human, but in reality, that is what we are doing when society uses fear and avoids facts in the discussions at hand. Once a person is seen as an object, it’s easy to do inhumane things to them.  That’s the problem with calling people names like trolls and shills.

I’m deeply troubled by highly esteemed professors and celebrities going around calling others names.  If they are leaders, does a leader seek to take away the human element of our world?  Sure Food Evolution is a movie but it tells a powerful story of humans and what we’ve gone through.  There are real stories in the movie and calling one’s story propaganda is hurtful.  From the small papaya farmer in Hawaii to the African mother who is seeking to feed her children, we are no different from each other as humans.  We bleed the same blood and we feel the pain of suffering.  We want what is best for our families.  I know there are others deserving the same comforts that I have which makes for a good quality of life.  What’s wrong with stepping back and looking at the facts presented in Food Evolution that GM technology may be helpful?  Are you not willing to learn the plight of others?

Brave people are willing to change their beliefs and lead us in the right way.  Yes, you esteemed professors, you have a duty to your students and to the public to teach compassion and remind students that there’s a world far away from us that is affected by our actions.  You can change your mind and know that others will thank you for it.  You’ll face a lot of hate from such a challenge but be brave for the others that you will indeed help.

Please stop the troll and shill cries once and for all and start opening your heart to listen to the needs of your fellow human.  May this story of biotechnology help others as it has helped my family.  We are all human and need to help create that compassionate world for our children.


Just one of my little “trolls” that I love with all of my heart.  She’s not propaganda and nor is she an object.

Food Evolution

A few days ago, I was able to watch the Food Evolution movie.  I’ve read so many reviews about it and was really excited to see it.  I’m cheering that there is finally a pro-science movie being played!

I have to admit that it really brought out a range of emotions in me.  The first 15 minutes left me feeling infuriated beyond belief because the Hawaii anti-GMO movement was replayed.  The same emotions I felt as that unfolded became fresh again.  I felt sick, angry, and sad.

It still upsets me to this day that my home, Hawaii, was used to affect the world’s ability to access the very technology that save our family farm.  That same technology is helping farmers in Bangladesh, India, South Africa, Brazil, and so many other places.  However, wealthy elites like Andrew Kimbrell of the Center for Food Safety and pseudoscience pushers like Jeffrey Smith are using fear and intentional misinformation to keep improved plants from the global farmer.  The foodie culture that touts non-GMO and organic food as better does the same to the small subsistence farmer in need of tools.  They say no to technology but offer nothing in return.

Food Evolution isn’t just a movie or “propaganda” as the anti-GMO activists claim.  It’s communication of the true story of biotechnology globally. It tells the story of the papaya in Hawaii and other innovations in the world.  When people like Vani Hari, Zen Honeycutt, Charles Benbrook, and others use primitive psychological tactics like fear to move their followers to stop the story from being heard, our fellow global citizens are being denied a basic quality of life.  Zen even goes as far to say she trusts only the social media and needs no scientist to tell her what to believe.

There is something afoul in society when dishonesty and blockading of technology starts to harm the most vulnerable.  As I’ve observed for years of the discriminatory nature of the anti-GMO activists, it’s the well nourished and well fed that parade as Earth saviors that are against the well being of humanity.  To proudly dress up as bees or bananas then proclaim you’re doing mankind a favor is exactly what your costume represents, something transient and fake.  Even putting on hazmat suits and destroying plants promotes suffering.  Once the facade is gone, we are all humans and are you doing the right thing for our fellow human?

In one clip of the movie, the organic banana farmer realizes that with no food means famine and poverty.  If we truly want to save our planet, we have to have consideration for humanity.  Providing a basic quality of life for our fellow human being is the pono thing to do.  Listening to imported fear that takes advantage of ignorance is the most toxic poison in the world because it denies technology and innovation to those who could benefit the most.  This is what breaks my heart knowing what the future will hold for those worlds away from us.

July 10th at Kahala Mall Consolidated Theaters will play Food Evolution.  I hope it touches you as much as it inspired me to continue the fight for truth.  It’s a movie of hope for the future and a challenge for many to face the reality of what they may believe.




The Journey of Hokulea


They voyaging canoe, the Hokulea, arrive in Honolulu yesterday which was a tremendous fear after traveling the globe.  Millions watched as it sailed into the shore. A long journey was completed.

If it were not for the brave souls who decided to collect information from the wind, stars, weather, and ocean currents, what we know as Native Hawaiians may have not arrived here in Hawaii. As Hokulea traveled the world following the ancient ways, it’s a reminder that someone must take that first brave step to change the future.

Is it good to be clinging to the relics of old and be blinded to what the future holds? Or do we use the past as a reminder of what our ancestors did to get us where we are today?

To look well into the universe to see beyond what we know is like jumping into that canoe and taking a new journey for the people of Hawaii and even humanity.



My dad has a very funny story he tells about his adventures on the farm.  I love hearing him tell of such a different life that so many of us know nothing about.

When my grandparents moved to Kaneohe in the late 1930’s, the majority of the landscape was farms.  They settled down near Keole Road to start up their farm.  They tended to cows, taro, and bananas.  Being that the area was rural, no sewer lines or cesspools were in the area so if you wanted a toilet, you had to build an outhouse.


My grandfather was a resourceful man who would take my dad and his siblings down to the junk pile to search for little treasures that might be useful to make something.  He’d take an old can and fill it with old nails and screws and other stuff.  Many of the old structures he had built were made from stuff that was thrown out.  Back in those days, it wasn’t too hip to recycle and using old junk was just a symbol of a poor farmer.  I doubt he really cared about that image very much because he continued to use junk and scraps for years to make sheds and other farm structures.

From the junks of others, a useful outhouse was built outside their home.  Nothing was bought to make it.  I think of it as a pretty amazing feat how he could transform what looked like trash into a fully functioning outhouse.

Back in those days, there wasn’t bountiful amounts of affordable of toilet paper either and people had to make do with what they had.  Toilet paper for my dad’s family was using the old tissues that wrapped oranges.  They saved all of the tissues from the oranges and recycled the old crates to store it.  Just to have tissue to wipe was a luxury for my dad.

One night, when my dad was about 8 years old, he had to go to the outhouse very badly.  In those days, there was no lights and everything was pitch black.  Being the resourceful kid he was, he decided to take the matches with him to provide some light while using the toilet.  He made his way in the dark to the outhouse with no problem but inside, he thought he’d make some light and lit a match.  He took the match and lit a piece of tissue for light.  Before he knew what was happening, the tissue burst into flames and he dropped it into the crate of tissues.  In no time at all, the tissues were set afire and then the entire outhouse was set on fire, sending him running into the bushes naked.

He told me that it is a story that he would never live down because the blaze could be seen from a distance and it was well known to many that Kenneth burned down the family toilet.  We still laugh heartily at that story every time he tells it.  It also reminds me how his generation really was the first “green” people.

As an occupational therapist working with rehabilitating people, I see firsthand how much the older generations were very much “green.” When someone has a hip replacement or some major illnesses, the basic task of toileting becomes difficult.  I have to teach people how to get back to being independent with something so many take for granted.  One thing I’ve noticed is that my seniors have a very unique way of using toilet paper.

Instead of grabbing a wad of toilet paper, my patients will carefully count out their preferred about of toilet tissue.  If you hand them a wad of toilet paper, they will unfold it and separate the squares.  Then they fold it in a very certain pattern before wiping.  They will use those 4 or 5 squares to get multiple wipes from it and I get so impressed with this toilet paper origami.  These behaviors are lifelong learned patterns of using resources wisely because they knew there would be times when there may not be any.

I do chuckle about this but there is a grain of truth in the old ways and learning from the lessons they experienced.  When we are in abundance, we do go for quantity, whether it be food or toilet paper.  It’s human behavior to indulge.  There is a price to pay with indulgence as it leads to unintended consequences like a clogged toilet or weight gain.  No longer do I see huge advertisements for supersizing food or buying huge quantities of food.  I admit that I used to stock up at Costco for foodstuff only to realize that we weren’t eating all of what we bought.  That discount we thought we were getting became a wash when we landed up wasting the food.

It’s easy to want to fall back on that behavior of more is better.  My friend started gardening and I mentioned to her that she needed to apply slug bait to prevent rat lungworm disease.  She rushed out to buy the pesticide and said she shook that stuff all over her garden instead of following the label.  There’s not much to lose by using more to home gardeners and following the label isn’t a big deal when the bottle costs less than $20.  If a gardener were to do the cost analysis of growing those cucumbers and lettuce, heads, they’d be shock to know how much it would cost to grow it.

To farmers it’s a complete different story.  Some people believe that farmers will toss fertilizer out like crazy but when it means cutting into your bottomline, that is far from the truth.  When you’re trying to maximize the benefit of a product to help support your livelihood, you’re not going to toss out bags of stuff that costs you money!  It’s not going to provide any additional benefits and will have an unintended consequence along the way.

We all can learn from the lessons of the past to guide us for the future.  Clamoring for the old is a different story when you’ve actually lived it to know what it’s like.  My dad’s lessons keep me grounded and appreciating what I have now.




The Cost of Unintended Consequences


Who uses pesticides? Many people and it’s evident by the violations issued to homeowners, landscapers, county workers, businesses, agricultural users, the state, and pest control operators.  

A few days ago, I decided to start my usual routine of digging up weeds from my garden. As hacked away at the weeds filling my garden boxes, I dug up a nice fat Cuban slug from my taro box hidden among the weeds.  I remembered that I hadn’t put slug bait in that new box so decided to treat my garden with it to prevent rat lungworm disease.  Eww is all I could think of.

As case number 15 of rat lungworm disease came to light last month, my blood boils a bit because of what has happened over the last several years.  For years, I had to testify to legislators about farmers’ need for pesticides and that we indeed were proper users for good reason.  I remember a meeting where Representative Chris Lee as well as several others sat there listening and the feedback we got was that the farmers need to do more to educate the public.  No sooner did that meeting happen then I hear of Rep. Lee, Rep. Creagan, and Senator Josh Green joining in on the anti-pesticide bills being lobbied by the Center for Food Safety’s Ashely Lukens.  The fear mongering continued for nearly 3 years masquerading as a “big ag” issue but really was something affecting all farmers statewide.

When the pesticide mongering was at its height, I remember walking past farmer’s market booths bragging about selling pesticide free products.  Many signs also touted that it was grown organically too.  I used to think that this “hipster” eating will bite us in the ass sooner or later and sure enough, it has brought to light a real microscopic monster that has been in Hawaii for nearly 50 years.

I’ve seen lots of blame being placed on the Department of Health for not doing enough about the issue and legislators not funding research about this.  A few weeks ago, I received a mass email from Ashley Lukens of the Center for Food Safety bragging about not getting the organic tax credit law rescinded this past session.  Her group, along with the other anti-ag groups like the Surfrider Foundation, the Sierra Club, and even Earthjustice, spent taxpayer dollars to fight a conflated problem and enabled a real problem to surface.

We also stopped multiple industry bills aimed at attacking small farmers (HB452), repealing the organic farming tax credit (HB961) and setting unreasonable standards that mandate all applicators of any pesticide be forced to report their usage (HB1302).

There was ZERO mention of a real food safety issue affecting every farm.  No peep of rat lungworm disease.  Organic farmers and even conventional farmers have lost a lot of sales because of this issue and buyers have turned to the mainland sources instead of heeding the buy local slogans.  For a group that demanded the right to know, I’m not shocked that she prefers to keep the public in the dark about what organic farmers spray and the amounts being used.  Shouldn’t it be fair across the board? I get so mad knowing that this is just another chip at agriculture overall that will make us 100% dependent upon imports.

None of these environmental groups even shared info to their followers on opportunities to follow good agricultural practices either.  These groups told people that government couldn’t be trusted and by sharing info from extension agents only contradicts what they’ve been telling the public all these years.  The focus on trusting experts is in dire need right now but none of these groups could ever turn that stone over and show how wrong they were to begin with.

The tax credit for organic farmers won’t even matter when no one wants to buy their produce in fear of rat lungworm disease.  Why would any consumer want to risk catching this preventable illness to eat expensive, possibly unsafe produce, that wasn’t grown properly?  The experts have already stated that controlling the vectors like rats and slugs is a huge way to prevent this from happening.  There’s even emergency situations where organic farmers can use pesticides to manage this issue.  The fact that pesticides have utility is really coming to the forefront as more stories are told of pain and debility from this parasite.  I’d like to see the politicians repeal that law next year and put the funds back in to help ALL farmers produce safe food and get a tax break, not just one certain group.  To not do that is discrimination if you ask me.

The failure of legislators to not focus on evidence based problems is showing up as many unintended consequences.  The little fire ant invaded a Maui lot necessitating a court order to allow for treatment of the pests is telling of the fear mongering by those claiming to protect the environment.  The Zika virus and even sharp rises in dengue fever also brought fear to the Big Island and Senator Green called for spraying of pesticides to protect people.  The Civil Beat article also notes that spraying becomes difficult with many organic farms who will lose certification but fails to mention that there are emergency measures that can be taken to avoid that.

I’ve always thought that the leaders of our state, the legislators, had a duty to protect the public and use resources wisely.  That clearly isn’t what’s happening here.  The fear mongering of the organic industry against pesticides has brought rat lungworm disease to the forefront and helped to harbor the little fire ant.  Many livelihoods including their own farmers have been impacted and will be if there isn’t some accountability placed upon these “leaders.”  They’ve clearly made some bad decisions that have permanently changed the lives of many people.  The public deserves better from those holding office and a reminder of the oath they took to protect us, as well as make the best decisions instead of looking at ways to pad their own coffers and egos.


A March for Humanity

IMG_6904 (1)

Given all the brouhaha happening around the March for Science yesterday, I was a bit hesitant to see what would unfold.  There was a lot of talk on the social media to be present at the march to protest my presence and the group I represented, the Alliance for Science.

As people started to gather for the rally, I started to see the protesters’ signs out in the crowd from anti-corporate accusations and about the Papahanaumokuakea Monument.  There was 4 gathered right in the front of the media folks with their anti-alliance signs to make it clear that I was not welcomed at this march.  Oddly, organizers were told that any hot topic signs or gear would not be allowed at the march, however, these people were allowed openly.  I even saw multiple people wearing anti-TMT shirts also.

Screen Shot 2017-04-23 at 11.08.07 PM

A fan club protesting the Alliance for Science.

As the rally opened, more and more people gathered around.  I didn’t see more anti folks though.  I was expecting to be heckled and yelled at but surprisingly, none of that happened.  It might be because my 2 year old wanted to be held and my 6 year old wanted to show off her “Science feeds the world” sign she had drawn.  It was a relief after I spoke, my children did not have to face rude adults.


After speaking, I headed towards the table I had set up to spark conversations and talk about science.  I brought my beautiful red Indian corn cob, cotton bolls, photos of GM papaya and virus infected ones, diseased plants, Norman Borlaug stickers, some Alliance pens and stickers.  Our table was filled with things to look at and touch to help bring curious people in.


It was really funny when people would lean in close and whisper quietly if we were about GMOs.  People were afraid to ask us what we stood for.  Between several of us volunteers there, we worked on educating people about evidence based policies and access to technology on a global scale.  When they realized what the Alliance stood for, there were so many sighs of relief and so many shared their thoughts about how cool genetic engineering was looking out to be.  Many great conversations happened.

My other Alliance member, James Green, was quite clever in his approach to manning the table.  He stood with a cardboard sign with a graph of the Dunning-Kruger effect on one side and the other side explaining what it meant.  He started out by explaining to curious people why there was such strong opinions about the technology but in reality, the true knowledge and expertise was not there.  I’d have to say that many people learned about why GMOs sounded bad but in reality wasn’t when you delved further.


As the day went on, one of the protesters decided to stand in front of our table with his sign raised over his head to show his stance against us.  He stood there for several minutes and I realized that he’d probably stay there for a long time.  I thought to myself, “What a rude guy to do this kind of shenanigan?”  I assessed the situation make sure that if it got ugly, my kids were not around.  I decided to talk to this guy and see what his deal was.  I figured that if he’d do something ugly, there were lots of witnesses around.

IMG_6919 (1)

The protester who decided to stand at our table.

I came in front of  him and read his sign and said, “Why are you standing in front of our table and not coming to talk story?  That is so not local style.”  He proceed to tell me that he heard that the Alliance for Science was being funded by Monsanto.  In my own head I was like, oh, geez, again.  I might have a crazy one ranting about all the horrible accusations.  What have I gotten myself into now?

I continued to talk to him and said, “You think that I’m working for Monsanto because I’m supporting GMO technology?” He said that only Monsanto would put on a booth like this with all the information and stuff.  I said no way.  I told him that I was up until 2:30 in the morning getting prepared for today.  I had set up the photos, stickers, and stuff and even paid for it myself.  He was in disbelief and said that it couldn’t be true.  I replied that if he wanted to see my receipts, I’d be happy to show him.  I continued to tell him my story about my dad and brother’s farm being saved by technology.

As that story came out, he started to realize that I wasn’t Monsanto and that GMOs like that were good.  He said that he was a marine biologist with some training in molecular biology so he understood that.  Then he said that GMOs are bad because of pesticides.  I wanted to bang my head but instead, smiled and took his hand and brought him to my table.  “Come here and let me show you what I’m talking about,” I told him.

I pulled out one of the lectures I had heard at Cornell on GMOs.  I showed him photos of the Bt eggplant damage from the shoot borer and how small farmers had to spray many times to prevent damage.  Then I showed him a photo of the Bt eggplant and how it had no damage and needed little spraying if anything.  I also talked to him about witchweed and how it destroyed people’s crops but if the seed was coated in herbicides, a crop could grow and yield something.  He told me that he was a scientist and agreed that this applications were a good thing.

Despite this he kept going on about how the pesticides was the issue.  I responded that if he wanted less pesticides, then how could it be done? I waited for his answer and he realized that GM technology could be utilized to change the plant to need less spraying.  I could see a light go on in his head when he realized that.

I pushed back on him a bit and asked why was he hanging out with anti-GMO people who were sitting across the way, refusing to interact.  I told him that if he was a scientist and knows the benefit of GMOs, why isn’t he educating his friends on it?  He said that he knew the benefits of biotech being from Costa Rica but that some people don’t understand it.  I reiterated to him that if he wants less pesticides and better farming, we need research and science leading the charge.  He agreed but then went back to Monsanto.  I was losing my patience and said, “Would you please think about what we just talked about that it’s not about Monsanto.”  He laughed and our conversation didn’t divert but luckily, my attention went to someone else who wanted to talk to me, a cousin who found me on 23andme.


My newly found cousin found through genetic testing, Jason Higa!

After I had a great talk with Jason, I went back to help at the table and my protester was still hanging out.  We continued talking and eventually got on to the subject of vaccinations which he surprisingly supported.  He was upset at babies dying around the world because of the anti-vaccination movement.  I pointed out to him that supporting the anti-GMO stance he had contributes the anti-vax movement by promoting science denial.  I asked him if he wanted more babies dying because of this rejection of the evidence, to which he stated no.  He was appalled at the anti-vaccination movement and the spread of preventable diseases like measles, whooping cough, and mumps.

My protester friend was still standing in front of our table but he had dropped his sign.  We continued talking about the amazing things happening in the world of science and agriculture and decided to take a photo together.  He said that he would try to educate his fellow anti friends that not all GMOs mean pesticides or corporations.  I hope he follows through with his word.

IMG_6924 (1)

Javier and I became friends after talking story.

A day that started out with a bit of apprehension actually turned out to be terrific as another person came to talk to me too.  I had first encountered this student in a group on Facebook when she had posted some buffer zone links to gather testimony for it.  I countered her on it to get her to look at the facts. I also encouraged her to dig deeper and find the actual evidence to her claims. She decided to stop by our table and talk story with me wanting to learn why I held the stances I did against the buffer zone laws.

I pulled out a photo of the papaya tree kicked down by my dad’s fearful neighbor.  I explained to her that this issue about buffer zones isn’t based in science if people are taking those kinds of actions.  She was a bit surprised because she had believed that children had been sickened which necessitated it.  I asked her if she had looked up the evidence for the claim to which she couldn’t answer.  I told her that I’d be happy to show her the evidence so that she doesn’t contribute to the attacks against farmers.  She seemed more than willing to learn and gave me her card, which I’ll be contacting her in the future.


As I spoke with many children and parents, it was clear to me that few understood the story of agriculture when they picked up my stickers.  I asked them if they knew who was pictured on it.  Very few were able to identify Norman Borlaug.  I explained to the children that he believed that all people should have food, which they agreed upon was a very good thing.

A lot of learning took place at this March for Science event despite me being censored from talking about GMOs, the Thirty Meter Telescope, and vaccines.  The mood of the marchers was so different than the marches against the TMT and GMOs.  Those marches were full of angry people whose only bond was being against something.  Anger bonded these people together and it made for some ugly after effects.  This same anger fueled more anger and hate that spewed out into the social media for years to come.  This group of people armed with emotion is what led to the breakdown of communities across our state because logic and rational thinking was lost in the equation.

However, at the March for Science, the atmosphere was very friendly and people were curious and willing to talk story with each other.  We were all for something, with the exception of those protesters. The censoring didn’t stop the truth from being discussed or heard.  In fact there were lots of signs about science saving lives and astronomy.

When the march was done, the lawn wasn’t full of garbage or signs thrown the ground like so many other marches.  I saw many people taking home their signs instead of dumping it in the trash cans.  Everyone cooperated and helped to fold up tables and chairs and put it back in it’s place.  The march for science brought out a different crowd indeed and it was pretty amazing to see the civility and cooperation come out in people from all walks of life.  My daughters made many friends from various marchers and even took some photos with their signs.

What I learned from participating in this march is that those who support science and the scientists themselves must be willing to take the brave step in leading our communities in the right direction.  When we are focused on a common goal that helps the greater good, we can put our energies towards the pressing problems ahead of us.  Standing aside and being unwilling to even acknowledge another person isn’t going to create a movement for a better world.

I learned the name of my protester that day.  His name was Javier and despite starting the day feeling apprehensive about him, he is just another person and by taking the first step to talk to him, he was able to have a civil, factual, and rational conversation about a “hot topic.” The rest of his friends who protested didn’t even come near the information that was available to see and learn from.  Even the environmentalist guy who showed up to protest me refused to even show an interest in our table, despite me sharing his post encouraging him to learn.  Javier thanked me for coming up to him and talking with him and I said thank you for talking with me!

We need learners in this world who are willing to be curious about what is happening.  Those who are capable of talking story so that we all can work together to make it better.  The more we focus on collaboration, the better we can sustain our communities for all of humanity.


The ahu is symbolic of building communities and working together.